↓ Skip to main content

Bridges, brokers and boundary spanners in collaborative networks: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
26 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
544 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bridges, brokers and boundary spanners in collaborative networks: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-158
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janet C Long, Frances C Cunningham, Jeffrey Braithwaite

Abstract

Bridges, brokers and boundary spanners facilitate transactions and the flow of information between people or groups who either have no physical or cognitive access to one another, or alternatively, who have no basis on which to trust each other. The health care sector is a context that is rich in isolated clusters, such as silos and professional "tribes," in need of connectivity. It is a key challenge in health service management to understand, analyse and exploit the role of key agents who have the capacity to connect disparate groupings in larger systems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 544 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 518 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 113 21%
Researcher 90 17%
Student > Master 72 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 47 9%
Other 26 5%
Other 101 19%
Unknown 95 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 137 25%
Business, Management and Accounting 81 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 52 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 5%
Environmental Science 22 4%
Other 109 20%
Unknown 117 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,577,684
of 25,262,379 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#518
of 8,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,185
of 197,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#6
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,262,379 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.