You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Bridges, brokers and boundary spanners in collaborative networks: a systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-13-158 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Janet C Long, Frances C Cunningham, Jeffrey Braithwaite |
Abstract |
Bridges, brokers and boundary spanners facilitate transactions and the flow of information between people or groups who either have no physical or cognitive access to one another, or alternatively, who have no basis on which to trust each other. The health care sector is a context that is rich in isolated clusters, such as silos and professional "tribes," in need of connectivity. It is a key challenge in health service management to understand, analyse and exploit the role of key agents who have the capacity to connect disparate groupings in larger systems. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 9 | 35% |
Canada | 3 | 12% |
Australia | 2 | 8% |
South Africa | 1 | 4% |
United States | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 10 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 58% |
Scientists | 7 | 27% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 544 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 8 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
India | 2 | <1% |
Mexico | 2 | <1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Other | 2 | <1% |
Unknown | 518 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 113 | 21% |
Researcher | 90 | 17% |
Student > Master | 72 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 47 | 9% |
Other | 26 | 5% |
Other | 101 | 19% |
Unknown | 95 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 137 | 25% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 81 | 15% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 5% |
Environmental Science | 22 | 4% |
Other | 109 | 20% |
Unknown | 117 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,577,684
of 25,262,379 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#518
of 8,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,185
of 197,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#6
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,262,379 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.