You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A review of mental health recovery programs in selected industrialized countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Mental Health Systems, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13033-016-0104-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Harold A. Pincus, Brigitta Spaeth-Rublee, Grant Sara, Elliot M. Goldner, Pamela N. Prince, Parashar Ramanuj, Wolfgang Gaebel, Jürgen Zielasek, Isabell Großimlinghaus, Margo Wrigley, Jaap van Weeghel, Mark Smith, Torleif Ruud, John R. Mitchell, Lisa Patton |
| Abstract |
The concept of recovery has gained increasing attention and many mental health systems have taken steps to move towards more recovery oriented practice and service structures. This article represents a description of current recovery-oriented programs in participating countries including recovery measurement tools. Although there is growing acceptance that recovery needs to be one of the key domains of quality in mental health care, the implementation and delivery of recovery oriented services and corresponding evaluation strategies as an integral part of mental health care have been lacking. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 29% |
| Canada | 2 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Denmark | 1 | 7% |
| Ireland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
| Scientists | 3 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 117 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 16% |
| Researcher | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 43 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 23 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 43 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2017.
All research outputs
#3,059,968
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#168
of 718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,676
of 416,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.