You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ethnobotanical study on wild edible plants used by three trans-boundary ethnic groups in Jiangcheng County, Pu’er, Southwest China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13002-020-00420-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yilin Cao, Ren Li, Shishun Zhou, Liang Song, Ruichang Quan, Huabin Hu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 4% |
| Professor | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 45 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 4% |
| Linguistics | 3 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 44 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,682,308
of 23,377,816 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#327
of 743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,313
of 421,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,377,816 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.