↓ Skip to main content

CAR-T cell therapy followed by allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation yielded comparable outcome between Ph like ALL and other high-risk ALL

Overview of attention for article published in Biomarker Research, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CAR-T cell therapy followed by allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation yielded comparable outcome between Ph like ALL and other high-risk ALL
Published in
Biomarker Research, February 2023
DOI 10.1186/s40364-023-00451-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hai-ping Dai, Dan-qing Kong, Hong-jie Shen, Wei Cui, Qian Wang, Zheng Li, Jia Yin, Li-qing Kang, Lei Yu, De-pei Wu, Xiao-wen Tang

Abstract

It was previously believed that patients with Ph-like ALL had poorer prognosis compared with other B-ALL subgroups due to resistance to conventional chemotherapy and lack of targeted drugs. CAR-T therapy has been successfully applied in the treatment of relapsed and refractory B-ALL. Currently, there are few data on whether CAR-T therapy can alter the outcome of Ph-like ALL. Here we included 17 Ph-like, 23 Ph+ and 51 other B-ALL patients, who received autologous CAR T-cell therapy and subsequently allogenic stem cell transplantation. Patients in the Ph-like group and B-ALL-others group were younger that those in the Ph+ group (P=0.001). Ph-like and Ph+ ALL patients showed higher white blood cell counts at diagnosis (P=0.025). The percentage of patients with active disease before receiving CAR T-cells infusion was 64.7%, 39.1% and 62.7% in the Ph-like, Ph+ and B-ALL-others groups. The response rates to CAR-T therapy were 94.1% (16/17), 95.6% (22/23) and 98.0% (50/51) in the Ph-like, Ph+ and B-ALL-others groups. Measurable residual disease negative CR was achieved in 64.7% (11/17), 60.9% (14/23) and 54.9% (28/51) in the Ph-like, Ph+ and B-ALL-others groups, respectively. The estimated rates of 3-year overall survival (65.9%±16.5%, 59.7%±10.5% and 61.6%±7.3%, P=0.758) and 3-year relapse-free survival (59.8%±14.8%, 63.1%±10.5% and 56.3%±7.1%, P=0.764) were comparable among the Ph-like, Ph+ and B-ALL-others groups. Estimated 3-year cumulative relapse rate was 7.8%±0.6%, 23.4%±0.9% and 29.0%±0.4% (P=0.241). Our findings suggest that CART followed by allo-HSCT results in a comparable prognosis in Ph-like ALL and other high-risk B-ALL.Trial registration ClinicalTrials. gov, NCT03275493, Registered on September 7, 2017, prospectively registered and NCT03614858, Registered on August 3, 2018, prospectively registered.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2023.
All research outputs
#20,772,911
of 23,377,816 outputs
Outputs from Biomarker Research
#270
of 336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#287,087
of 367,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomarker Research
#18
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,377,816 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 336 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.