You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Influence of pilot and small trials in meta-analyses of behavioral interventions: a meta-epidemiological study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-023-02184-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael W. Beets, R. Glenn Weaver, John P. A. Ioannidis, Christopher D. Pfledderer, Alexis Jones, Lauren von Klinggraeff, Bridget Armstrong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 22% |
| Germany | 2 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Sweden | 1 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| Denmark | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 50% |
| Scientists | 9 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Researcher | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 2 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Psychology | 1 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2023.
All research outputs
#3,400,415
of 25,436,226 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#620
of 2,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,871
of 428,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#8
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,436,226 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.