You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Inadvertent filtering bleb due to extracapsular cataract extraction wound reopening after mitomycin C use: a case report
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Medical Case Reports, February 2023
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13256-023-03784-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Phit Upaphong, Kessara Pathanapitoon, Winai Chaidaroon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2023.
All research outputs
#22,755,718
of 25,380,192 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#3,969
of 4,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#358,443
of 420,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#114
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,380,192 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,548 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.