You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Non-deletional alpha thalassaemia: a review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13023-020-01429-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ibrahim Kalle Kwaifa, Mei I. Lai, Sabariah Md Noor |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 109 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 56 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 55 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2023.
All research outputs
#3,038,889
of 23,394,907 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#427
of 2,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,772
of 399,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#11
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,394,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.