↓ Skip to main content

Effects of ingestion of a commercially available thermogenic dietary supplement on resting energy expenditure, mood state and cardiovascular measures

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
12 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of ingestion of a commercially available thermogenic dietary supplement on resting energy expenditure, mood state and cardiovascular measures
Published in
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
DOI 10.1186/1550-2783-10-25
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jordan Outlaw, Colin Wilborn, Abbie Smith, Stacie Urbina, Sara Hayward, Cliffa Foster, Shawn Wells, Rob Wildman, Lem Taylor

Abstract

Increasing metabolism is a primary focus of many commercially available dietary supplements marketed to support weight management. Caffeine (e.g. anhydrous and herbal) and green tea are key ingredients in such products, augmenting resting energy expenditure (REE) and improving reported mood states (alertness, fatigue, focus, etc.). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of a thermogenic dietary supplement (DBX) on REE, respiratory exchange ratio (RER), reported measures of alertness, focus, energy, concentration, fatigue, and hunger, as well as the general safety of the product based on electrocardiogram (ECG) and hemodynamic responses in habitual caffeine consumers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 126 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 21%
Student > Master 18 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Postgraduate 11 9%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 28 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 26 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 32 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2013.
All research outputs
#2,946,823
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#481
of 892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,083
of 442,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#460
of 851 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.2. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 851 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.