You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reported reasons for non-use of insecticide-treated nets in large national household surveys, 2009–2021
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-023-04490-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hannah Koenker, E. Kuor Kumoji, Marcy Erskine, Robert Opoku, Eleanore Sternberg, Cameron Taylor |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 33% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Kenya | 1 | 5% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 81% |
| Scientists | 3 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 16 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 16 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,197,819
of 24,721,757 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#420
of 5,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,342
of 412,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#5
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,721,757 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,788 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.