You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nonrestorative sleep is a risk factor for metabolic syndrome in the general Japanese population
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13098-023-00999-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yuichiro Otsuka, Yoshitaka Kaneita, Katsutoshi Tanaka, Osamu Itani, Yoshiyuki Kaneko, Masahiro Suzuki, Yuuki Matsumoto, Kenichi Kuriyama |
| Abstract |
This longitudinal study aimed to investigate the effects of nonrestorative sleep on developing metabolic syndrome (MetS) and related diseases in a general Japanese middle-aged population. Overall, 83,224 adults without MetS (mean age: 51.5 ± 3.5 years) from the Health Insurance Association in Japan were followed up for a maximum of 8 years between 2011 and 2019. The Cox proportional hazard method was used to determine whether nonrestorative sleep, assessed using a single-item question, was significantly associated with the respective development of MetS, obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia. The MetS criteria were adopted by the Examination Committee for Criteria of Metabolic Syndrome in Japan. The mean follow-up duration was 6.0 years. The incidence rate of MetS was 50.1 person-years/1,000 during the study period. Data suggested that nonrestorative sleep was associated with MetS (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-1.16) and other disorders, such as obesity (HR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.02-1.12), hypertension (HR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.04-1.11), and diabetes (HR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.01-1.12) but not with dyslipidemia (HR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.97-1.03). Nonrestorative sleep is associated with the development of MetS and many of its core components in the middle-aged Japanese population. Therefore, assessing nonrestorative sleep may help identify individuals at a risk of MetS development. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 63% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Psychology | 1 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 69% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2023.
All research outputs
#17,189,469
of 25,250,629 outputs
Outputs from Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
#439
of 791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,212
of 416,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
#16
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,250,629 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.