You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Determinates of muscle precursor cell therapy efficacy in a nonhuman primate model of intrinsic urinary sphincter deficiency
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13287-016-0461-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James Koudy Williams, Ashley Dean, Shannon Lankford, Tracy Criswell, Gopal Badlani, Karl-Erik Andersson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 33% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 8% |
| Engineering | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2023.
All research outputs
#4,316,110
of 23,410,748 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#425
of 2,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,226
of 422,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#9
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,410,748 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.