↓ Skip to main content

Quality of life at the end of life

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, August 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quality of life at the end of life
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, August 2007
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-5-51
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paula Diehr, William E Lafferty, Donald L Patrick, Lois Downey, Sean M Devlin, Leanna J Standish

Abstract

Little is known about self-perceived quality of life (QOL) near the end of life, because such information is difficult to collect and to interpret. Here, we describe QOL in the weeks near death and determine correlates of QOL over time, with emphasis on accounting for death and missing data. Data on QOL were collected approximately every week in an ongoing randomized trial involving persons at the end of life. We used these data to describe QOL in the 52 weeks after enrollment in the trial (prospective analysis, N = 115), and also in the 10 weeks just prior to death (retrospective analysis, N = 83). The analysis consisted of graphs and regressions that accounted explicitly for death and imputed missing data. QOL was better than expected until the final 3 weeks of life, when a terminal drop was observed. Gender, race, education, cancer, and baseline health status were not significantly related to the number of "weeks of good-quality life" (WQL) during the study period. Persons younger than 60 had significantly higher WQL than older persons in the prospective analysis, but significantly lower WQL in the retrospective analysis. The retrospective results were somewhat sensitive to the imputation model. In this exploratory study, QOL was better than expected in persons at the end of life, but special interventions may be needed for persons approaching a premature death, and also for the last 3 weeks of life. Our descriptions of the trajectory of QOL at the end of life may help other investigators to plan and analyze future studies of QOL. Methodology for dealing with death and the high amount of missing data in longitudinal studies at the end of life needs further investigation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Indonesia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 108 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 17%
Researcher 18 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Professor 8 7%
Other 28 24%
Unknown 19 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 11%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Psychology 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 25 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2007.
All research outputs
#5,514,596
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#605
of 2,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,432
of 67,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them