You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effect of repeat refresher courses on neonatal resuscitation skill decay: an experimental comparative study of in-person and video-based simulation training
|
---|---|
Published in |
Advances in Simulation, February 2023
|
DOI | 10.1186/s41077-023-00244-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Julia M. McCaw, Sarah E. Gardner Yelton, Sean A. Tackett, Rainier M. L. L. Rapal, Arianne N. Gamalinda, Amelia Arellano-Reyles, Genevieve D. Tupas, Ces Derecho, Fides Ababon, Jill Edwardson, Nicole A. Shilkofski |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 23% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 8% |
South Africa | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 77% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer | 2 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
Professor | 1 | 6% |
Librarian | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 25% |
Engineering | 2 | 13% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 6% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2023.
All research outputs
#4,255,484
of 23,743,910 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Simulation
#154
of 245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,856
of 418,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Simulation
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,743,910 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.