↓ Skip to main content

Correction: Differences between experimental and placebo arms in manual therapy trials: a methodological review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correction: Differences between experimental and placebo arms in manual therapy trials: a methodological review
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, February 2023
DOI 10.1186/s12874-023-01865-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giandomenico D’Alessandro, Nuria Ruffini, Alessandro Aquino, Matteo Galli, Mattia Innocenti, Marco Tramontano, Francesco Cerritelli

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2023.
All research outputs
#5,934,234
of 23,437,201 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#842
of 2,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,809
of 342,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#15
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,437,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.