You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative effectiveness of BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccines against COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-023-02795-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jie Wei, Weiya Zhang, Michael Doherty, Zachary S. Wallace, Jeffrey A. Sparks, Na Lu, Xiaoxiao Li, Chao Zeng, Guanghua Lei, Yuqing Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Librarian | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,692,805
of 24,703,227 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#2,783
of 3,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,162
of 408,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#79
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,703,227 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.8. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.