You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A window of opportunity trial evaluating intratumoral injection of Copaxone® in patients with percutaneously accessible tumors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Translational Medicine Communications, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41231-023-00137-9 |
| Authors |
Joaquina C. Baranda, Ghulam Rehman Mohyuddin, Andrés M. Bur, Yelizaveta Shnayder, Kyle R. Sweeney, Kiran Kakarala, Megan Prouty, Harsh Pathak, Rajni Puri, Amrita Mitra, Rashna Madan, M. Laird Forrest, Aric Huang, Scott Weir, Andrew K. Godwin, Nabil A. Alhakamy, J. Daniel Griffin, Cory J. Berkland |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2023.
All research outputs
#14,799,554
of 25,401,381 outputs
Outputs from Translational Medicine Communications
#32
of 93 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,804
of 423,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Translational Medicine Communications
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,401,381 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.