You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Circulating amino acid levels and colorectal cancer risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition and UK Biobank cohorts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-023-02739-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joseph A. Rothwell, Jelena Bešević, Niki Dimou, Marie Breeur, Neil Murphy, Mazda Jenab, Roland Wedekind, Vivian Viallon, Pietro Ferrari, David Achaintre, Audrey Gicquiau, Sabina Rinaldi, Augustin Scalbert, Inge Huybrechts, Cornelia Prehn, Jerzy Adamski, Amanda J. Cross, Hector Keun, Marc Chadeau-Hyam, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault, Kim Overvad, Christina C. Dahm, Therese Haugdahl Nøst, Torkjel M. Sandanger, Guri Skeie, Raul Zamora-Ros, Kostas K. Tsilidis, Fabian Eichelmann, Matthias B. Schulze, Bethany van Guelpen, Linda Vidman, Maria-José Sánchez, Pilar Amiano, Eva Ardanaz, Karl Smith-Byrne, Ruth Travis, Verena Katzke, Rudolf Kaaks, Jeroen W. G. Derksen, Sandra Colorado-Yohar, Rosario Tumino, Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Paolo Vineis, Domenico Palli, Fabrizio Pasanisi, Anne Kirstine Eriksen, Anne Tjønneland, Gianluca Severi, Marc J. Gunter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 37% |
| Spain | 3 | 16% |
| France | 3 | 16% |
| Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 58% |
| Scientists | 4 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 41% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 24% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2023.
All research outputs
#3,220,894
of 25,364,936 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,962
of 4,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,354
of 422,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#50
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,364,936 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,004 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.