You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Expanding the phenome and variome of the ROBO-SLIT pathway in congenital heart defects: toward improving the genetic testing yield of CHD
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12967-023-03994-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hager Jaouadi, Chris Jopling, Fanny Bajolle, Alexis Théron, Adèle Faucherre, Hilla Gerard, Sarab Al Dybiat, Caroline Ovaert, Damien Bonnet, Jean-François Avierinos, Stéphane Zaffran |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2023.
All research outputs
#15,794,207
of 23,462,326 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#2,337
of 4,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,419
of 333,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#73
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,462,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.