↓ Skip to main content

Taste and pheromone perception in mammals and flies

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, June 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Taste and pheromone perception in mammals and flies
Published in
Genome Biology, June 2003
DOI 10.1186/gb-2003-4-7-220
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiroaki Matsunami, Hubert Amrein

Abstract

The olfactory systems of insects and mammals have analogous anatomical features and use similar molecular logic for olfactory coding. The molecular underpinnings of the chemosensory systems that detect taste and pheromone cues have only recently been characterized. Comparison of these systems in Drosophila and mouse uncovers clear differences and a few surprising similarities.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Germany 2 2%
France 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 99 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 16%
Student > Master 12 11%
Professor 11 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 12 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 66 59%
Neuroscience 9 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Chemistry 4 4%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 12 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2010.
All research outputs
#6,440,215
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#3,087
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,676
of 52,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 52,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.