You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mitochondrial diseases in Hong Kong: prevalence, clinical characteristics and genetic landscape
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13023-023-02632-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tsz-sum Wong, Kiran M. Belaramani, Chun-kong Chan, Wing-ki Chan, Wai-lun Larry Chan, Shek-kwan Chang, Sing-ngai Cheung, Ka-yin Cheung, Yuk-fai Cheung, Shuk-ching Josephine Chong, Chi-kwan Jasmine Chow, Hon-yin Brian Chung, Sin-ying Florence Fan, Wai-ming Joshua Fok, Ka-wing Fong, Tsui-hang Sharon Fung, Kwok-fai Hui, Ting-hin Hui, Joannie Hui, Chun-hung Ko, Min-chung Kwan, Mei-kwan Anne Kwok, Sung-shing Jeffrey Kwok, Moon-sing Lai, Yau-on Lam, Ching-wan Lam, Ming-chung Lau, Chun-yiu Eric Law, Wing-cheong Lee, Han-chih Hencher Lee, Chin-nam Lee, Kin-hang Leung, Kit-yan Leung, Siu-hung Li, Tsz-ki Jacky Ling, Kam-tim Timothy Liu, Fai-man Lo, Hiu-tung Lui, Ching-on Luk, Ho-ming Luk, Che-kwan Ma, Karen Ma, Kam-hung Ma, Yuen-ni Mew, Alex Mo, Sui-fun Ng, Wing-kit Grace Poon, Richard Rodenburg, Bun Sheng, Jan Smeitink, Cheuk-ling Charing Szeto, Shuk-mui Tai, Choi-ting Alan Tse, Li-yan Lilian Tsung, Ho-ming June Wong, Wing-yin Winnie Wong, Kwok-kui Wong, Suet-na Sheila Wong, Chun-nei Virginia Wong, Wai-shan Sammy Wong, Chi-kin Felix Wong, Shun-ping Wu, Hiu-fung Jerome Wu, Man-mut Yau, Kin-cheong Eric Yau, Wai-lan Yeung, Hon-ming Jonas Yeung, Kin-keung Edwin Yip, Pui-hong Terence Young, Gao Yuan, Yuet-ping Liz Yuen, Chi-lap Yuen, Cheuk-wing Fung |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 50% |
| Researcher | 2 | 25% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 25% |
| Other | 1 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 50% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2023.
All research outputs
#20,982,612
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#2,480
of 3,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#318,235
of 424,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#44
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.