↓ Skip to main content

Adenosquamous carcinoma coexisting with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Case Reports, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adenosquamous carcinoma coexisting with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: a case report
Published in
Journal of Medical Case Reports, March 2023
DOI 10.1186/s13256-023-03798-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hirozumi Sawai, Yuka Kiriyama, Hiromasa Kuzuya, Yoshiaki Fujii, Shuhei Ueno, Shuji Koide, Masaaki Kurimoto, Kenji Yamao, Yoichi Matsuo, Mamoru Morimoto, Hajime Koide, Atsushi Kamiya

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2023.
All research outputs
#22,783,107
of 25,401,381 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#3,945
of 4,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#361,467
of 422,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#123
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,401,381 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,568 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.