↓ Skip to main content

Identification of specific susceptibility loci for the early-onset colorectal cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification of specific susceptibility loci for the early-onset colorectal cancer
Published in
Genome Medicine, March 2023
DOI 10.1186/s13073-023-01163-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Haoxue Wang, Yimin Cai, Meng Jin, Chao Qun Huang, Caibo Ning, Siyuan Niu, Linyun Fan, Bin Li, Ming Zhang, Zequn Lu, Xuesi Dong, Zilin Luo, Rong Zhong, Heng Li, Ying Zhu, Xiaoping Miao, Xiaojun Yang, Jiang Chang, Ni Li, Jianbo Tian

Abstract

The incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC; patients < 50 years old) has been rising rapidly, whereas the EOCRC genetic susceptibility remains incompletely investigated. Here, we aimed to systematically identify specific susceptible genetic variants for EOCRC. Two parallel GWASs were conducted in 17,789 CRC cases (including 1490 EOCRC cases) and 19,951 healthy controls. A polygenic risk score (PRS) model was built based on identified EOCRC-specific susceptibility variants by using the UK Biobank cohort. We also interpreted the potential biological mechanisms of the prioritized risk variant. We identified 49 independent susceptibility loci that were significantly associated with the susceptibility to EOCRC and the diagnosed age of CRC (both P < 5.0×10-4), replicating 3 previous CRC GWAS loci. There are 88 assigned susceptibility genes involved in chromatin assembly and DNA replication pathways, mainly associating with precancerous polyps. Additionally, we assessed the genetic effect of the identified variants by developing a PRS model. Compared to the individuals in the low genetic risk group, the individuals in the high genetic risk group have increased EOCRC risk, and these results were replicated in the UKB cohort with a 1.63-fold risk (95% CI: 1.32-2.02, P = 7.67×10-6). The addition of the identified EOCRC risk loci significantly increased the prediction accuracy of the PRS model, compared to the PRS model derived from the previous GWAS-identified loci. Mechanistically, we also elucidated that rs12794623 may contribute to the early stage of CRC carcinogenesis via allele-specific regulating the expression of POLA2. These findings will broaden the understanding of the etiology of EOCRC and may facilitate the early screening and individualized prevention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 22%
Student > Master 3 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Unspecified 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,339,413
of 25,387,480 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#1,173
of 1,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,178
of 416,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#17
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,480 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.