↓ Skip to main content

A new biomarker panel of ultraconserved long non-coding RNAs for bladder cancer prognosis by a machine learning based methodology

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A new biomarker panel of ultraconserved long non-coding RNAs for bladder cancer prognosis by a machine learning based methodology
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, March 2023
DOI 10.1186/s12859-023-05167-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angelo Ciaramella, Emanuel Di Nardo, Daniela Terracciano, Lia Conte, Ferdinando Febbraio, Amelia Cimmino

Abstract

Recent studies have indicated that a special class of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), namely Transcribed-Ultraconservative Regions are transcribed from specific DNA regions (T-UCRs), 100[Formula: see text] conserved in human, mouse, and rat genomes. This is noticeable, as lncRNAs are usually poorly conserved. Despite their peculiarities, T-UCRs remain very understudied in many diseases, including cancer and, yet, it is known that dysregulation of T-UCRs is associated with cancer as well as with human neurological, cardiovascular, and developmental pathologies. We have recently reported the T-UCR uc.8+ as a potential prognostic biomarker in bladder cancer. The aim of this work is to develop a methodology, based on machine learning techniques, for the selection of a predictive signature panel for bladder cancer onset. To this end, we analyzed the expression profiles of T-UCRs from surgically removed normal and bladder cancer tissues, by using custom expression microarray. Bladder tissue samples from 24 bladder cancer patients (12 Low Grade and 12 High Grade), with complete clinical data, and 17 control samples from normal bladder epithelium were analysed. After the selection of preferentially expressed and statistically significant T-UCRs, we adopted an ensemble of statistical and machine learning based approaches (i.e., logistic regression, Random Forest, XGBoost and LASSO) for ranking the most important diagnostic molecules. We identified a signature panel of 13 selected T-UCRs with altered expression profiles in cancer, able to efficiently discriminate between normal and bladder cancer patient samples. Also, using this signature panel, we classified bladder cancer patients in four groups, each characterized by a different survival extent. As expected, the group including only Low Grade bladder cancer patients had greater overall survival than patients with the majority of High Grade bladder cancer. However, a specific signature of deregulated T-UCRs identifies sub-types of bladder cancer patients with different prognosis regardless of the bladder cancer Grade. Here we present the results for the classification of bladder cancer (Low and High Grade) patient samples and normal bladder epithelium controls by using a machine learning application. The T-UCR's panel can be used for learning an eXplainable Artificial Intelligent model and develop a robust decision support system for bladder cancer early diagnosis providing urinary T-UCRs data of new patients. The use of this system instead of the current methodology will result in a non-invasive approach, reducing uncomfortable procedures (such as cystoscopy) for the patients. Overall, these results raise the possibility of new automatic systems, which could help the RNA-based prognosis and/or the cancer therapy in bladder cancer patients, and demonstrate the successful application of Artificial Intelligence to the definition of an independent prognostic biomarker panel.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 17%
Other 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Unknown 8 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Unknown 10 83%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2023.
All research outputs
#21,319,834
of 23,947,581 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#7,065
of 7,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#337,020
of 422,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#135
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,947,581 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.