↓ Skip to main content

Influence network model uncovers relations between biological processes and mutational signatures

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Influence network model uncovers relations between biological processes and mutational signatures
Published in
Genome Medicine, March 2023
DOI 10.1186/s13073-023-01162-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bayarbaatar Amgalan, Damian Wojtowicz, Yoo-Ah Kim, Teresa M. Przytycka

Abstract

There has been a growing appreciation recently that mutagenic processes can be studied through the lenses of mutational signatures, which represent characteristic mutation patterns attributed to individual mutagens. However, the causal links between mutagens and observed mutation patterns as well as other types of interactions between mutagenic processes and molecular pathways are not fully understood, limiting the utility of mutational signatures. To gain insights into these relationships, we developed a network-based method, named GENESIGNET that constructs an influence network among genes and mutational signatures. The approach leverages sparse partial correlation among other statistical techniques to uncover dominant influence relations between the activities of network nodes. Applying GENESIGNET to cancer data sets, we uncovered important relations between mutational signatures and several cellular processes that can shed light on cancer-related processes. Our results are consistent with previous findings, such as the impact of homologous recombination deficiency on clustered APOBEC mutations in breast cancer. The network identified by GENESIGNET also suggest an interaction between APOBEC hypermutation and activation of regulatory T Cells (Tregs), as well as a relation between APOBEC mutations and changes in DNA conformation. GENESIGNET also exposed a possible link between the SBS8 signature of unknown etiology and the Nucleotide Excision Repair (NER) pathway. GENESIGNET provides a new and powerful method to reveal the relation between mutational signatures and gene expression. The GENESIGNET method was implemented in python, and installable package, source codes and the data sets used for and generated during this study are available at the Github site https://github.com/ncbi/GeneSigNet.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 18%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 9%
Unknown 6 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2023.
All research outputs
#15,752,973
of 24,945,754 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#1,367
of 1,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,025
of 412,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#23
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,945,754 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.