You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A framework for stakeholder identification in concept mapping and health research: a novel process and its application to older adult mobility and the built environment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-428 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claire Schiller, Meghan Winters, Heather M Hanson, Maureen C Ashe |
| Abstract |
Stakeholders, as originally defined in theory, are groups or individual who can affect or are affected by an issue. Stakeholders are an important source of information in health research, providing critical perspectives and new insights on the complex determinants of health. The intersection of built and social environments with older adult mobility is an area of research that is fundamentally interdisciplinary and would benefit from a better understanding of stakeholder perspectives. Although a rich body of literature surrounds stakeholder theory, a systematic process for identifying health stakeholders in practice does not exist. This paper presents a framework of stakeholders related to older adult mobility and the built environment, and further outlines a process for systematically identifying stakeholders that can be applied in other health contexts, with a particular emphasis on concept mapping research. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 333 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 329 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 80 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 15% |
| Researcher | 33 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 43 | 13% |
| Unknown | 83 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 58 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 31 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 62 | 19% |
| Unknown | 100 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,293,070
of 25,257,066 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,842
of 16,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,509
of 197,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#131
of 303 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,257,066 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 303 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.