↓ Skip to main content

Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy with a central high dose using CyberKnife for metastatic lung tumors

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy with a central high dose using CyberKnife for metastatic lung tumors
Published in
BMC Cancer, March 2023
DOI 10.1186/s12885-023-10635-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kazuhiko Hayashi, Osamu Suzuki, Hiroya Shiomi, Hitoshi Ono, Akira Setoguchi, Masataka Nakai, Erina Nakanishi, Shotaro Tatekawa, Naoko Ose, Takero Hirata, Keisuke Tamari, Yuji Seo, Soichiro Funaki, Fumiaki Isohashi, Shinichi Shimizu, Yasushi Shintani, Kazuhiko Ogawa

Abstract

The CyberKnife system features a robotically-positioned linear accelerator to deliver real-time image-guided stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR). It achieves steep dose gradients using irradiation from hundreds of different directions and increases the central dose of the gross tumor volume (GTV) without increasing the marginal dose to the planning target volume. We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of SABR with a central high dose using CyberKnife for metastatic lung tumors. A total of 73 patients with 112 metastatic lung tumors treated with CyberKnife were retrospectively analyzed. Local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The median age was 69.2 years. The most common primary sites were the uterus (n = 34), colorectum (n = 24), head and neck (n = 17), and esophagus (n = 16). For peripheral lung tumors, the median radiation dose was 52 Gy in 4 fractions, whereas for centrally located lung tumors, it was 60 Gy in 8-10 fractions. The dose prescription was defined as 99% of the solid tumor components of the GTV. The median maximum dose within the GTV was 61.0 Gy. The GTV and planning target volume were enclosed conformally by the 80% and 70% isodose lines of the maximum dose, respectively. The median follow-up period was extended to 24.7 months; it was 33.0 months for survivors. The 2-year local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 89.1%, 37.1%, and 71.3%, respectively. Toxicities of grade ≥ 2 were noted as grade 2 and 3 radiation pneumonitis in one patient each. The two patients with grade 2 or higher radiation pneumonitis had both received simultaneous irradiation at two or three metastatic lung tumor sites. No toxicity of grade ≥ 2 was observed in patients with metastasis in one lung only. SABR with a central high dose using CyberKnife for metastatic lung tumors is effective with acceptable toxicity. Number: 20557, Name: Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy using CyberKnife for metastatic lung tumor, URL: http://www.radonc.med.osaka-u.ac.jp/pdf/SBRT.pdf , Date of registration: April 1, 2021 (retrospectively registered), Date of enrollment: May 1, 2014.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 14%
Librarian 1 14%
Unknown 5 71%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 14%
Unspecified 1 14%
Unknown 5 71%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2023.
All research outputs
#16,188,009
of 23,868,920 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#4,285
of 8,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,642
of 406,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#67
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,868,920 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,544 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.