↓ Skip to main content

Exonized Alu repeats in the 3’UTR of a CYP20A1_Alu-LT transcript act as a miRNA sponge

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exonized Alu repeats in the 3’UTR of a CYP20A1_Alu-LT transcript act as a miRNA sponge
Published in
BMC Research Notes, March 2023
DOI 10.1186/s13104-023-06289-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Khushboo Singhal, Sonam Dhamija, Mitali Mukerji

Abstract

Alu repeats have gained huge importance in the creation and modification of regulatory networks. We previously reported a unique isoform of human CYP20A1 i.e. CYP20A1_Alu-LT with 23 Alu repeats exonized in its 9 kb long 3'UTR with 4742 potential binding sites for 994 miRNAs. The role of this transcript was hypothesized as a potential miRNA sponge in primary neurons as its expression correlated with that of 380 genes having shared miRNA sites and enriched in neuro-coagulopathy. This study provides experimental evidence for the miRNA sponge activity of CYP20A1_Alu-LT in neuronal cell lines. We studied the Alu-rich fragment of the CYP20A1_Alu-LT extended 3'UTR with > 10 binding sites for miR-619-5p and miR-3677-3p. Enrichment of the Alu-rich fragment with Ago2 confirmed miRNA association of this transcript. Cloning the fragment downstream of a reporter gene led to a 90% decrease in luciferase activity. Overexpression and knockdown studies revealed a positive correlation between the expression of CYP20A1_Alu-LT and miR-619-5p / miR-3677-3p target genes. GAP43, one of the key modulators of nerve regeneration, was significantly altered by the expression of CYP20A1_Alu-LT. This study, for the first time, provides evidence for a unique regulatory function of exonized Alu repeats as miRNA sponges.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Professor 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 50%
Social Sciences 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2023.
All research outputs
#16,581,265
of 24,394,820 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#2,429
of 4,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,452
of 408,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#10
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,394,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.