↓ Skip to main content

Bacteria and tumours: causative agents or opportunistic inhabitants?

Overview of attention for article published in Infectious Agents and Cancer, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 607)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bacteria and tumours: causative agents or opportunistic inhabitants?
Published in
Infectious Agents and Cancer, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1750-9378-8-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanne Cummins, Mark Tangney

Abstract

Associations between different bacteria and various tumours have been reported in patients for decades. Studies involving characterisation of bacteria within tumour tissues have traditionally been in the context of tumourigenesis as a result of bacterial presence within healthy tissues, and in general, dogma holds that such bacteria are causative agents of malignancy (directly or indirectly). While evidence suggests that this may be the case for certain tumour types and bacterial species, it is plausible that in many cases, clinical observations of bacteria within tumours arise from spontaneous infection of established tumours. Indeed, growth of bacteria specifically within tumours following deliberate systemic administration has been demonstrated for numerous bacterial species at preclinical and clinical levels. We present the available data on links between bacteria and tumours, and propose that besides the few instances in which pathogens are playing a pathogenic role in cancer, in many instances, the prevalent relationship between solid tumours and bacteria is opportunistic rather than causative, and discuss opportunities for exploiting tumour-specific bacterial growth for cancer treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Malaysia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 175 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 17%
Student > Master 27 15%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 7%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 31 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 43 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,921,393
of 25,163,238 outputs
Outputs from Infectious Agents and Cancer
#27
of 607 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,994
of 203,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infectious Agents and Cancer
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,163,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 607 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them