You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prognostic value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance T1 mapping and extracellular volume fraction in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-023-00919-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Farah Cadour, Morgane Quemeneur, Loic Biere, Erwan Donal, Zakarya Bentatou, Jean-Christophe Eicher, François Roubille, Alain Lalande, Roch Giorgi, Stanislas Rapacchi, Sébastien Cortaredona, Farouk Tradi, Axel Bartoli, Serge Willoteaux, François Delahaye, Stephanie M. Biene, Lionel Mangin, Nadine Ferrier, Jean-Nicolas Dacher, Fabrice Bauer, Guillaume Leurent, Pierre-Axel Lentz, Hélène Kovacsik, Pierre Croisille, Franck Thuny, Monique Bernard, Maxime Guye, Alain Furber, Gilbert Habib, Alexis Jacquier |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 11% |
| Researcher | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 13 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 43% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2023.
All research outputs
#15,748,014
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#978
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,445
of 477,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#11
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 477,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.