You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Seroprevalence of hepatitis C virus in Jinan, China, 2008–2020
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Medical Research, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40001-023-01063-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mingjie Xu, Fang Liu, Qianqian Zhao, Yunying Zhou, Yuanmei Zhuang, Mingyu Ji |
| Abstract |
The updated estimates of hepatitis C virus (HCV) seroprevalence are critical for developing strategies to manage or eliminate HCV infection. A comprehensive study on HCV seroprevalence was conducted among 365,210 patients at Jinan Central Hospital, China, from 2008 to 2020. The patients were tested for anti-HCV, HCV core antigen, hepatitis B surface antigen, syphilis antibody, human immunodeficiency virus antigen + antibody, antihepatitis A virus IgM, and antihepatitis E virus IgM. HCV seroprevalence was 0.79% and was related to age. HCV seropositivity was lower in children (aged < 18 years) than in adults (aged ≥ 18 years) (0.15% vs. 0.81%). High HCV prevalence was reported in adults aged ≥ 41 years, and HCV seropositivity in those aged 41-80 years accounted for 74.56% of all seropositive individuals. Notably, the rate of HCV-HIV coinfection was 0. HCV seroprevalence was considerably higher in patients at the Kidney Disease Unit and Dialysis Department than in those at other departments (inpatient or outpatient). HCV seroprevalence was lower in Jinan region but higher in patients at the Kidney Disease Unit and Dialysis Department, especially in those undergoing hemodialysis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 27% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 13% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2023.
All research outputs
#17,301,727
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Medical Research
#442
of 924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,054
of 423,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Medical Research
#22
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.