↓ Skip to main content

Patient and public involvement in research: a review of practical resources for young investigators

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Rheumatology, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 253)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patient and public involvement in research: a review of practical resources for young investigators
Published in
BMC Rheumatology, March 2023
DOI 10.1186/s41927-023-00327-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ashokan Arumugam, Lawrence Rick Phillips, Ann Moore, Senthil D. Kumaran, Kesava Kovanur Sampath, Filippo Migliorini, Nicola Maffulli, Bathri Narayanan Ranganadhababu, Fatma Hegazy, Angie Botto-van Bemden

Abstract

Patient and public involvement (PPI) in every aspect of research will add valuable insights from patients' experiences, help to explore barriers and facilitators to their compliance/adherence to assessment and treatment methods, bring meaningful outcomes that could meet their expectations, needs and preferences, reduce health care costs, and improve dissemination of research findings. It is essential to ensure competence of the research team by capacity building with available resources on PPI. This review summarizes practical resources for PPI in various stages of research projects-conception, co-creation, design (including qualitative or mixed methods), execution, implementation, feedback, authorship, acknowledgement and remuneration of patient research partners, and dissemination and communication of research findings with PPI. We have briefly summarized the recommendations and checklists, amongst others, for PPI in rheumatic and musculoskeletal research (e.g. the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) recommendations, the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) checklist and the Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public (GRIPP) checklist). Various tools that could be used to facilitate participation, communication and co-creation of research projects with PPI are highlighted in the review. We shed light on the opportunities and challenges for young investigators involving PPI in their research projects, and have summarized various resources that could be used to enhance PPI in various phases/aspects of research. A summary of web links to various tools and resources for PPI in various stages of research is provided in Additional file 1.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 10 14%
Student > Master 9 12%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 34 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 10 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 14%
Psychology 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 35 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,621,204
of 25,235,161 outputs
Outputs from BMC Rheumatology
#50
of 253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,996
of 414,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Rheumatology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,235,161 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them