↓ Skip to main content

Surface electromyography to quantify neuro-respiratory drive and neuro-mechanical coupling in mechanically ventilated children

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surface electromyography to quantify neuro-respiratory drive and neuro-mechanical coupling in mechanically ventilated children
Published in
Respiratory Research, March 2023
DOI 10.1186/s12931-023-02374-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alette A. Koopman, Jefta van Dijk, Eline Oppersma, Robert G. T. Blokpoel, Martin C. J. Kneyber

Abstract

The patient's neuro-respiratory drive, measured as electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi), quantifies the mechanical load on the respiratory muscles. It correlates with respiratory effort but requires a dedicated esophageal catheter. Transcutaneous (surface) monitoring of respiratory muscle electromyographic (sEMG) signals may be considered a suitable alternative to EAdi because of its non-invasive character, with the additional benefit that it allows for simultaneously monitoring of other respiratory muscles. We therefore sought to study the neuro-respiratory drive and timing of inspiratory muscles using sEMG in a cohort of children enrolled in a pediatric ventilation liberation trial. The neuro-mechanical coupling, relating the pressure generated by the inspiratory muscles to the sEMG signals of these muscles, was also calculated. This is a secondary analysis of data from a randomized cross-over trial in ventilated patients aged < 5 years. sEMG recordings of the diaphragm and parasternal intercostal muscles (ICM), esophageal pressure tracings and ventilator scalars were simultaneously recorded during continuous spontaneous ventilation and pressure controlled-intermittent mandatory ventilation, and at three levels of pressure support. Neuro-respiratory drive, timing of diaphragm and ICM relative to the mechanical ventilator's inspiration and neuro-mechanical coupling were quantified. Twenty-nine patients were included (median age: 5.9 months). In response to decreasing pressure support, both amplitude of sEMG (diaphragm: p = 0.001 and ICM: p = 0.002) and neuro-mechanical efficiency indices increased (diaphragm: p = 0.05 and ICM: p < 0.001). Poor correlations between neuro-respiratory drive and respiratory effort were found, with R2: 0.088 [0.021-0.152]. sEMG allows for the quantification of the electrical activity of the diaphragm and ICM in mechanically ventilated children. Both neuro-respiratory drive and neuro-mechanical efficiency increased in response to lower inspiratory assistance. There was poor correlation between neuro-respiratory drive and respiratory effort. ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05254691. Registered 24 February 2022, registered retrospectively.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Lecturer 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 6 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 14%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 7%
Unknown 7 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,000,973
of 25,481,734 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#862
of 3,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,804
of 426,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#19
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,481,734 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,076 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.