You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The outcome of IV vitamin C therapy in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-023-04392-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Baofang Liang, Jianwei Su, Hanquan Shao, Huiying Chen, Baocheng Xie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 11 | 11% |
| Colombia | 5 | 5% |
| Peru | 3 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| France | 3 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 52 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 80 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 13% |
| Scientists | 3 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 66% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 17% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 20 | 69% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#727,628
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#501
of 6,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,204
of 428,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#20
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.