You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The public impact of academic and print media portrayals of TMS: shining a spotlight on discrepancies in the literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-022-00760-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Abigail Scheper, Cynthia Rosenfeld, Veljko Dubljević |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 13% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 4% |
| Librarian | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 13 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 3 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2023.
All research outputs
#15,783,991
of 23,532,144 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#826
of 1,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,344
of 443,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#26
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,532,144 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,016 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.