You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Correction: Ketogenic diet as a glycine lowering therapy in nonketotic hyperglycinemia and impact on brain glycine levels
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13023-023-02646-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emily Shelkowitz, Russell P. Saneto, Walla Al-Hertani, Charlotte M. A. Lubout, Nicholas V. Stence, Mark S. Brown, Patrick Long, Diana Walleigh, Julie A. Nelson, Francisco E. Perez, Dennis W. W. Shaw, Emma J. Michl, Johan L. K. Van Hove |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2023.
All research outputs
#15,183,144
of 23,549,388 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,734
of 2,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,537
of 353,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#23
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,549,388 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.