You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Impact of different nutritional approaches on sarcopenia: a protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Systematic Reviews, March 2023
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13643-023-02215-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jung-Hyun Kim, Sung-Min Kim, Yong-Chan Kim, Byung-Kwan Seo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 25% |
Japan | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 22% |
Professor | 1 | 11% |
Other | 1 | 11% |
Student > Master | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 11% |
Computer Science | 1 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2023.
All research outputs
#14,690,931
of 23,532,144 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,534
of 2,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,952
of 344,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#18
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,532,144 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.