↓ Skip to main content

Factors that influence midwifery students in Ghana when deciding where to practice: a discrete choice experiment

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
217 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors that influence midwifery students in Ghana when deciding where to practice: a discrete choice experiment
Published in
BMC Medical Education, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-13-64
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Ageyi-Baffour, Sarah Rominski, Emmanuel Nakua, Mawuli Gyakobo, Jody R Lori

Abstract

Mal-distribution of the health workforce with a strong bias for urban living is a major constraint to expanding midwifery services in Ghana. According to the UN Millennium Development Goals (MDG) report, the high risk of dying in pregnancy or childbirth continues in Africa. Maternal death is currently estimated at 350 per 100,000, partially a reflection of the low rates of professional support during birth. Many women in rural areas of Ghana give birth alone or with a non-skilled attendant. Midwives are key healthcare providers in achieving the MDGs, specifically in reducing maternal mortality by three-quarters and reducing by two-thirds the under 5 child mortality rate by 2015.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 215 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 18%
Lecturer 28 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 12%
Researcher 25 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 7%
Other 40 18%
Unknown 43 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 48 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 15%
Social Sciences 30 14%
Psychology 20 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 13 6%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 50 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2013.
All research outputs
#20,732,510
of 23,332,901 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#3,268
of 3,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,409
of 194,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#40
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,332,901 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.