↓ Skip to main content

Developing a medical device-grade T2 phantom optimized for myocardial T2 mapping by cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developing a medical device-grade T2 phantom optimized for myocardial T2 mapping by cardiovascular magnetic resonance
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, March 2023
DOI 10.1186/s12968-023-00926-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Constantin-Cristian Topriceanu, Massimiliano Fornasiero, Han Seo, Matthew Webber, Kathryn E. Keenan, Karl F. Stupic, Rüdiger Bruehl, Bernd Ittermann, Kirsty Price, Louise McGrath, Wenjie Pang, Alun D. Hughes, Reza Nezafat, Peter Kellman, Iain Pierce, James C. Moon, Gabriella Captur

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Researcher 2 29%
Other 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 29%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 14%
Engineering 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2023.
All research outputs
#4,614,581
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#280
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,115
of 424,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#8
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.