↓ Skip to main content

Transcriptome dataset from Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Micro-Tom; wild type and two mutants of INDOLE-ACETIC-ACID (SlIAA9) using long-reads sequencing oxford nanopore technologies

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transcriptome dataset from Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Micro-Tom; wild type and two mutants of INDOLE-ACETIC-ACID (SlIAA9) using long-reads sequencing oxford nanopore technologies
Published in
BMC Research Notes, March 2023
DOI 10.1186/s13104-023-06306-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wahyu Muhammad Yuha Lubis, M Adrian, Nurul Jadid, Ani Widiastuti, Hiroshi Ezura, Syariful Mubarok, Dhika Prita Hapsari, Roedhy Poerwanto, Deden Derajat Matra

Abstract

Tomatoes are the most widely consumed fruit vegetable and are relatively easy to cultivate. However, an increase in temperature causes some plants to respond with a decrease in fruit production. So, it is necessary to develop plants resistant to extreme temperature changes. The tomato cv. Micro-Tom has genetic variations in the gene of INDOLE-ACETIC-ACID, namely SlIAA9-3 and SlIAA9-5. However, the genetic information regarding the full-length transcript of the gene from this type of tomato plant is unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the full-length transcript of the genes of these three types of tomatoes using long-reads sequencing technology from Oxford Nanopore. The total RNA from three types of Micro-Tom was isolated with the RNeasy PowerPlant Kit. Then, the RNA sequencing process used PCR-cDNA Barcoding kit - SQK-PCB109 and continued with the processing of raw reads based on the protocol from microbepore protocol ( https://github.com/felixgrunberger/microbepore ). The resulting raw reads were 578 374, 409 905, and 851 948 for wildtype, iaa9-3, and iaa9-5, respectively. After obtaining cleaned reads, each sample was mapped to the tomato reference genome (S. lycopersicum ITAG4.0) with the Minimap2 program. In particular, 965 genes were expressed only in the iaa9-3 mutant, and 2332 genes were expressed only in the iaa9-5 mutant. Whereas in the wild type, 1536 genes are specifically expressed. In cluster analysis using the heatmap analysis, separate groups were obtained between the wild type and the two mutants. This proves an overall difference in transcript levels between the wild type and the mutants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 25%
Unknown 6 75%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemical Engineering 1 13%
Unknown 7 88%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2023.
All research outputs
#15,332,906
of 23,572,509 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#2,148
of 4,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,298
of 335,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,572,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,294 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.