↓ Skip to main content

Concordance in pathogen identification at the upper and lower respiratory tract of children with severe pneumonia

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Concordance in pathogen identification at the upper and lower respiratory tract of children with severe pneumonia
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, March 2023
DOI 10.1186/s12879-023-08127-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heping Wang, Xiaonan Li, Yuejie Zheng, Lilly M. Verhagen, Jiali Gu, Li Li, Zhi Xu, Wenjian Wang, Marien I. de Jonge

Abstract

Nasopharyngeal swabs are taken to determine the causative agent of community acquired pneumonia (CAP), while the reliability of upper respiratory tract sampling as a proxy for lower respiratory tract infections is still unclear. Nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid samples and clinical data were collected from 153 hospitalized children between 3 months and 14 years of age with severe CAP, enrolled from March to June 2019. Written informed consent for the storage and use of the samples for further studies was obtained from the parents or caregivers. Putative pathogens were detected using a sensitive, high-throughput GeXP-based multiplex PCR and qPCR. The same bacterial species in paired samples were found in 29 (23.4%) and the same viral species in 52 (27.5%) of the patients. moderate concordance was found for Mycoplasma pneumoniae (ĸ=0.64), followed by Haemophilus influenzae (ĸ=0.42). The strongest discordance was observed for human adenovirus and also for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the latter was exclusively detected in BAL samples. In the adenovirus cases strong concordance was associated with high viral loads in the NP swabs. The variation in concordance in pathogen detection in the upper and lower respiratory tract of children with severe pneumonia is generally high but varies depending on the species. Novel and impactful insights are the concordance between NP and BAL detection for M. pneumoniae and H. influenzae and the strong correlation between high adenoviral loads in NP swabs and detection in BAL fluid.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 19%
Unspecified 2 13%
Researcher 1 6%
Unknown 10 63%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 25%
Unspecified 2 13%
Unknown 10 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2023.
All research outputs
#15,866,607
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#4,573
of 7,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,720
of 330,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#62
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,855 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.