↓ Skip to main content

Construction of pain prediction model for patients undergoing hepatic arterial chemoembolization

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgical Oncology, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Construction of pain prediction model for patients undergoing hepatic arterial chemoembolization
Published in
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, March 2023
DOI 10.1186/s12957-023-02986-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ping-Wei Song, Ye-Hui Liu, Tao Wang, Lei Yu, Jing-Li Liu

Abstract

To construct a predictive model for pain in patients undergoing hepatic arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in interventional operating room. Through literature review and expert interviews, a questionnaire was prepared for the assessment of pain factors in patients with hepatic arterial chemoembolization. A prospective cohort study was used to select 228 patients with hepatic arterial chemoembolization in a tertiary and first-class hospital. The data of the patients in the pain group and the non-pain group were compared, and a rapid screening prediction model was constructed by univariate analysis and logistic regression analysis, and its prediction effect was tested. Tumor size, liver cancer stage, and chemoembolization with drug-loaded microspheres and pirarubicin hydrochloride (THP) mixed with lipiodol were independent predictors of pain in patients after hepatic arterial chemoembolization. Finally, the pain prediction model after TACE was obtained. The results of Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed that the model fit was good (χ2 = 13.540, p = 0.095). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.798, p < 0.001. The rapid screening and prediction model of pain in patients undergoing hepatic arterial chemoembolization has certain efficacy, which is helpful for clinical screening of patients with high risk of pain, and can provide reference for predictive pain management decision-making.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 33%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2023.
All research outputs
#15,866,607
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#640
of 2,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,720
of 330,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#7
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,103 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.