You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Discovery of Fibrinogen γ-chain as a potential urinary biomarker for renal interstitial fibrosis in IgA nephropathy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Nephrology, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12882-023-03103-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jie Guan, Meiling Wang, Man Zhao, Wentao Ni, Man Zhang |
| Abstract |
IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is a major cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Renal interstitial fibrosis is a hallmark of CKD progression. Non-invasive biomarkers are needed to dynamically evaluate renal fibrosis. Data independent acquisition (DIA)-based liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (DIA-MS) was used to identify candidate urinary biomarkers in IgAN patients with different renal interstitial fibrosis degrees. Eighteen biopsy-proven IgAN patients and six healthy controls were recruited in a discovery cohort. Interstitial fibrosis changes were evaluated according to Oxford MEST-C scores. Urinary samples were analyzed with DIA-MS to identify hub proteins. Hub proteins were then confirmed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in a validation cohort and the associated gene mRNA expression was analyzed using public gene expression omnibus (GEO) datasets. Complement and coagulation cascades pathway was the main KEGG pathway related to the over-expressed proteins. Fibrinogen γ-Chain (FGG) was selected as the potential urinary marker for further validation. Urinary FGG to creatinine ratio (uFGG/Cr) levels were higher in both disease controls and IgAN group than in healthy controls, but were not significantly different between IgAN and disease groups. uFGG/Cr was confirmed to be increased with the extent of renal fibrosis and presented moderate correlations with T score (r = 0.614, p < 0.01) and eGFR (r = -0.682, p < 0.01), and a mild correlation with UTP (r = 0.497, p < 0.01) in IgAN group. In disease control group, uFGG/Cr was higher in patients with T1 + 2 compared to those with T0. uFGG/Cr had a good discriminatory power to distinguish different fibrosis stages in IgAN: interstitial fibrosis ≤ 5% (minimal fibrosis) vs. interstitial fibrosis (mild fibrosis) > 5%, AUC 0.743; T0 vs. T1 + 2, AUC 0.839; T0 + 1 vs. T2, AUC 0.854. In disease control group, uFGG/Cr showed better performance of AUC than UTP between minimal and mild fibrosis (p = 0.038 for Delong's test). Moreover, GSE104954 dataset showed that FGG mRNA expression was up-regulated (fold change 1.20, p = 0.009) in tubulointerstitium of IgAN patients when compared to healthy living kidney donors. Urinary FGG is associated with renal interstitial fibrosis and could be used as a noninvasive biomarker for renal fibrosis in IgAN. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2023.
All research outputs
#16,624,878
of 24,457,696 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nephrology
#1,591
of 2,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,880
of 405,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nephrology
#34
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,457,696 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,652 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,777 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.