↓ Skip to main content

CT-based deep learning model for the prediction of DNA mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer: a diagnostic study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CT-based deep learning model for the prediction of DNA mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer: a diagnostic study
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, March 2023
DOI 10.1186/s12967-023-04023-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wuteng Cao, Huabin Hu, Jirui Guo, Qiyuan Qin, Yanbang Lian, Jiao Li, Qianyu Wu, Junhong Chen, Xinhua Wang, Yanhong Deng

Abstract

Stratification of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) status in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) enables individual clinical treatment decision making. The present study aimed to develop and validate a deep learning (DL) model based on the pre-treatment CT images for predicting MMR status in CRC. 1812 eligible participants (training cohort: n = 1124; internal validation cohort: n = 482; external validation cohort: n = 206) with CRC were enrolled from two institutions. All pretherapeutic CT images from three dimensions were trained by the ResNet101, then integrated by Gaussian process regression (GPR) to develop a full-automatic DL model for MMR status prediction. The predictive performance of the DL model was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and then tested in the internal and external validation cohorts. Additionally, the participants from institution 1 were sub-grouped by various clinical factors for subgroup analysis, then the predictive performance of the DL model for identifying MMR status between participants in different groups were compared. The full-automatic DL model was established in the training cohort to stratify the MMR status, which presented promising discriminative ability with the AUCs of 0.986 (95% CI 0.971-1.000) in the internal validation cohort and 0.915 (95% CI 0.870-0.960) in the external validation cohort. In addition, the subgroup analysis based on the thickness of CT images, clinical T and N stages, gender, the longest diameter, and the location of tumors revealed that the DL model showed similar satisfying prediction performance. The DL model may potentially serve as a noninvasive tool to facilitate the pre-treatment individualized prediction of MMR status in patients with CRC, which could promote the personalized clinical-making decision.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 27%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 6 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 3 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 9%
Unknown 6 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2023.
All research outputs
#19,452,862
of 23,924,883 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#3,137
of 4,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#294,389
of 401,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#108
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,924,883 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,242 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.