You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Visualizing differences in phylogenetic information content of alignments and distinction of three classes of long-branch effects
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, August 2007
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2148-7-147 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Johann Wolfgang Wägele, Christoph Mayer |
Abstract |
Published molecular phylogenies are usually based on data whose quality has not been explored prior to tree inference. This leads to errors because trees obtained with conventional methods suppress conflicting evidence, and because support values may be high even if there is no distinct phylogenetic signal. Tools that allow an a priori examination of data quality are rarely applied. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 5 | 3% |
United States | 4 | 2% |
Spain | 3 | 2% |
Italy | 2 | 1% |
Brazil | 2 | 1% |
Canada | 2 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Other | 6 | 3% |
Unknown | 156 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 52 | 28% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 18% |
Student > Master | 19 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 14 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 7% |
Other | 35 | 19% |
Unknown | 18 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 136 | 74% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 6% |
Environmental Science | 5 | 3% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 2% |
Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 3% |
Unknown | 19 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2014.
All research outputs
#4,532,382
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,143
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,248
of 81,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#6
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.