↓ Skip to main content

Exploration of lung mycobiome in the patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Microbiology, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploration of lung mycobiome in the patients with non-small-cell lung cancer
Published in
BMC Microbiology, March 2023
DOI 10.1186/s12866-023-02790-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yiming Zhao, Junqi Yi, Juanjuan Xiang, Wei Jia, Anqi Chen, Liyu Chen, Leliang Zheng, Wen Zhou, Minghua Wu, Zheng Yu, Jingqun Tang

Abstract

As the Human Microbiome Project (HMP) progresses, the relationship between microbes and human health has been receiving increasing attention. A growing number of reports support the correlation between cancer and microbes. However, most studies have focused on bacteria, rather than fungal communities. In this study, we studied the alteration in lung mycobiome in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using metagenomic sequencing and qPCR. The higher fungal diversity and more complex network were observed in the patients with NSCLC. In addition, Alternaria arborescens was found as the most relevant fungus to NSCLC, and the enrichment of it in cancerous tissue was also detected. This study proposes that the changes in fungal communities may be closely related to lung cancer, and provides insights into further exploration the relationship between lung cancer and fungi.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 11%
Neuroscience 1 11%
Chemistry 1 11%
Engineering 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2023.
All research outputs
#14,670,295
of 23,485,296 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#1,475
of 3,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,208
of 245,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#13
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,485,296 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,254 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.