↓ Skip to main content

Genome-wide prediction of discrete traits using bayesian regressions and machine learning

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics Selection Evolution, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome-wide prediction of discrete traits using bayesian regressions and machine learning
Published in
Genetics Selection Evolution, February 2011
DOI 10.1186/1297-9686-43-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oscar González-Recio, Selma Forni

Abstract

Genomic selection has gained much attention and the main goal is to increase the predictive accuracy and the genetic gain in livestock using dense marker information. Most methods dealing with the large p (number of covariates) small n (number of observations) problem have dealt only with continuous traits, but there are many important traits in livestock that are recorded in a discrete fashion (e.g. pregnancy outcome, disease resistance). It is necessary to evaluate alternatives to analyze discrete traits in a genome-wide prediction context.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Brazil 2 1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 154 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 20%
Student > Master 24 14%
Professor 9 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 4%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 31 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 47%
Computer Science 16 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Mathematics 6 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 40 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2021.
All research outputs
#3,941,275
of 26,547,438 outputs
Outputs from Genetics Selection Evolution
#81
of 833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,089
of 121,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics Selection Evolution
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,547,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 833 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them