You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Strong recommendations from low certainty evidence: a cross-sectional analysis of a suite of national guidelines
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2023
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12874-023-01895-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ming Chuen Chong, Melissa K. Sharp, Susan M. Smith, Michelle O’Neill, Máirín Ryan, Rosarie Lynch, Kamal R. Mahtani, Barbara Clyne |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 25% |
New Zealand | 1 | 13% |
France | 1 | 13% |
Ireland | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,052,647
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,047
of 2,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,259
of 424,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#22
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.