Cancer cachexia is a deadly wasting syndrome that accompanies various diseases (including ~ 50% of cancers). Clinical studies have established that cachexia is not a nutritional deficiency and is linked to expression of certain proteins (e.g., interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein), but much remains unknown about this often fatal syndrome.
First, cachexia was created in experimental mouse models of lung cancer. Samples of human lung cancer were used to identify the association between the serum lipocalin 2 (LCN2) level and cachexia progression. Then, mouse models with LCN2 blockade or LCN2 overexpression were used to ascertain the role of LCN2 upon ferroptosis and cachexia. Furthermore, antibody depletion of tissue-infiltrating neutrophils (TI-Neu), as well as myeloid-specific-knockout of Lcn2, were undertaken to reveal if LCN2 secreted by TI-Neu caused cachexia. Finally, chemical inhibition of ferroptosis was conducted to illustrate the effect of ferroptosis upon tissue wasting.
Protein expression of LCN2 was higher in the wasting adipose tissue and muscle tissues of experimental mouse models of lung cancer cachexia. Moreover, evaluation of lung cancer patients revealed an association between the serum LCN2 level and cachexia progression. Inhibition of LCN2 expression reduced cachexia symptoms significantly and inhibited tissue wasting in vivo. Strikingly, we discovered a significant increase in the number of TI-Neu in wasting tissues, and that these innate immune cells secreted high levels of LCN2. Antibody depletion of TI-Neu, as well as myeloid-specific-knockout of Lcn2, prevented ferroptosis and tissue wasting in experimental models of lung cancer cachexia. Chemical inhibition of ferroptosis alleviated tissue wasting significantly and also prolonged the survival of cachectic mice.
Our study provides new insights into how LCN2-induced ferroptosis functionally impacts tissue wasting. We identified LCN2 as a potential target in the treatment of cancer cachexia.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2023.
All research outputs
#18,964,585
of 23,504,445 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hematology & Oncology
#952
of 1,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,913
of 246,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hematology & Oncology
#11
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,504,445 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
