↓ Skip to main content

GVC: efficient random access compression for gene sequence variations

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
GVC: efficient random access compression for gene sequence variations
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, March 2023
DOI 10.1186/s12859-023-05240-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yeremia Gunawan Adhisantoso, Jan Voges, Christian Rohlfing, Viktor Tunev, Jens-Rainer Ohm, Jörn Ostermann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2023.
All research outputs
#15,160,792
of 24,513,158 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#4,644
of 7,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,517
of 405,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#75
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,513,158 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,548 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.