You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Targeted gene deletion with SpCas9 and multiple guide RNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana: four are better than two
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-023-01010-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jana Ordon, Niklas Kiel, Dieter Becker, Carola Kretschmer, Paul Schulze-Lefert, Johannes Stuttmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Germany | 2 | 11% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Austria | 1 | 5% |
| Russia | 1 | 5% |
| Argentina | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 47% |
| Scientists | 9 | 47% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 20% |
| Researcher | 4 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 4 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2023.
All research outputs
#3,105,184
of 24,620,113 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#162
of 1,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,009
of 406,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#10
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,620,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.